The Thus, we know with certainty that particles in

concept of generating knowledge with the “assumption of the existence of
uniformities” requires an examination of “assumption” and “uniformities”. Uniformities
allow researchers to simplify abstract concepts, such as in the Natural and
Human Sciences, which may lead to a rudimentary set of rules for testing and
confirmation. When the same sets of rules are applied, tested and confirmed, we
generate knowledge. In discussion of the knowledge questi?’

one must take into account whether the possession of a concept is equal to
knowing the rule. Furthermore, one must discuss the role of our memories of past experiences and observations in helping
us to predict future outcomes. Naturally, this presupposes that we believe
nature does not change and continues uniformly. Past human behavior, when under
specific conditions, can be used to predict future behavior within a short time
interval for example. Lastly, our belief in uniformity is founded on reasoning.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Empirical reasoning is used to interpret data obtained through sense perception
or observation. Since trends within divergent observations reappear throughout
the natural world, it may be inferred that nature is uniform in its operations1. It stands to reason that uniformities
are important in formulating theories that explain unobservable occurrences, and
that without assuming the existence of uniformities we cannot acquire
knowledge. Although despite its importance, that knowledge cannot be considered
complete and true unless
vigorously tested.

One has to take into account
if the
possession of a concept is equivalent to knowing the rule. For instance, the
kinetic particle theory explains the properties of the different states of
matter. Particles with more kinetic energy will vibrate faster and have the
energy needed to break forces of attraction holding the particles together.

Thus, we know with certainty that particles in a liquid have more kinetic
energy than in a solid. Such rules are derived from patterns that are
consistent and are difficult to disprove by contrary evidence within the field
of molecular mechanics.  

1 Ariew, R. and Watkins, E. (2009). Modern Philosophy. An anthology of Primary
Sources. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Inc. pg. 5-6