The Characteristics of a Learning Organization Essay

The learning organisation is the organisation which implements assorted procedures to capture new cognition and besides interpret new cognition into improved behavior, merchandises and services.

The learning organisation is typical in certain features which I observed as a pupil in USQ. The features of USQ as a acquisition organisation which I have participated in are listed.At USQ there is a clear organisation vision. Orr ( 2000 ) stated that the organisation vision is a critical feature of the learning organisation and it means that the organisation has clearly communicated and understood the vision, ends and aims which act as a model for larning across the organisation. USQ has a clear vision to leave cognition to its pupils and protect the unity and holiness of cognition. The organisation vision at USQ has ever been to pass on the ends and aims clearly to staff and pupils.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

The 2nd feature of organisation acquisition is team-working. Harmonizing to Snell, R ( 2001 ) squad working should concentrate on heightening the larning experience by the different team-members sharing experiences and endowment thereby bettering the productiveness of the squad. At USQ there is an accent on squad working and acquisition. The staff of the concern module has ever ensured that as pupils we are exposed to working and larning in a squad environment. The staff at USQ demonstrates squad working in the manner they manage the university. The university has different module and the different modules work in squads to guarantee that USQ is accomplishing the organisation aims by trusting on teamwork.The 3rd feature of a learning organisation is the blasted free civilization. Akella, D ( 2007 ) stated that in blasted free civilization persons are encouraged and supported to come foward and place errors and jobs and therefore larn how to better operations and avoid similar jobs in future.

A blasted free civilization helps persons position errors as learning chances. At USQ everyone is encouraged to near the module if any error has been committed. Similarly the high degree of transparence leads to a blasted free civilization which promotes organisation larning at USQ. Thus USQ displays a clear vision to leave cognition, squad working and a blasted free civilization to typify the charatacteristics of a learning organisation.Mentions:Brian Orr.A ( 2000, A May ) .

Organizational acquisition: Features of taking organizations.A CanadianHR Reporter, A 13 ( 10 ) , A 11.A Retrieved September 10, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. ( DocumentIdaho: A 82181721 )Snell, RobinA StanleyA ( 01/03/2001 ) .A ” Moral foundations of the acquisition organisation ” .

A Humandealingss ( New York ) A ( 0018-7267 ) , A 54A ( 3 ) , A p.A 319.Akella, DeviA ( 02/2007 ) .A ” Learning Organizations ” .A Global concern reviewA ( 0972-1509 ) , A 8A ( 1 ) , A p.A 13Question 2: Core cultural values USQCultural values in organisations are indispensable because in the long tally it ‘s the organisations which are driven by values which are successful instead than the organisations which focus on the dollar marks. The nucleus cultural values which I have observed at USQ are listed.The key to develop a value system within the organisation is to develop cultural resiliency.

( Cain, 2009 ) .The cultural resiliency is the ability of the organisation to stay stable even in the most seeking of state of affairss. USQ demonstrates the nucleus cultural values of diverseness and meritocracy. Diversity is a cultural value in an organisation where people from different backgrounds, nationalities, gender and races are encouraged to take part in the organisation.Harmonizing to Levin, D ( 2003 ) the ideal of diverseness in an organisation implies that one time an organisation becomes cognizant of this ideal it changes the composing of its work force and find the kind degree Fahrenheit interactions it tolerates and encourages at the workplace. The thought of diverseness would hold people from different backgrounds join forcesing for a common intent and this would be done without the struggle that normally accompanies intergroup interactions.

At USQ the staff belongs to different backgrounds and it is an equal chance employer for academic staff. Thus diverseness is a nucleus cultural value at USQ and the direction promotes the ideal of diverseness.The 2nd nucleus cultural value at USQ is meritocracy. Meritocracy is merely the application or acknowledging virtues above other considerations such as caste, race, sex or faith. As a university meritocracy is a nucleus cultural value embedded at USQ. Harmonizing to Gillies, V ( 2005 ) a civilization of meritocracy leads to societal mobility and societal inclusion for displaced subdivisions of the society.

At USQ the instruction is imparted and the pupils are judged strictly on virtue. The university promotes an ethical civilization where in order to advance excellence pupils are judged on the quality of their work and research. USQ has strict guidelines and guards against favoritism. USQ has demonstrated these core cultural values of meritocracy and diverseness. As a pupil I have ever received the classs which I deserve and am satisfied with the scaling system at the University. The university staff is really diverse and the pupils enrolled at USQ belong to different states.Mentions:Cain, A R.A ( 2009, A April ) .

Developing a Values-drive Organization.A World Trade, A 22 ( 4 ) , A 46-47.A Retrieved September 10, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. ( Document ID: A 1681341821 )Levine, DavidA PA ( 01/09/2003 ) .A ” The ideal of diverseness in organisations ” .A American reappraisal of public administrationA ( 0275-0740 ) , A 33A ( 3 ) , A p.

A 278.Gillies, ValA ( 01/12/2005 ) .A ” Raising the ‘Meritocracy ‘ : Parenting and the Individualization of Social Class ” .A Sociology ( Oxford ) A ( 0038-0385 ) , A 39A ( 5 ) , A p.A 835.Question 3: Cultural IntelligenceThe successful interaction across civilizations requires cultural intelligence. As an person who aspires to work in a transnational I am taking at bettering my cultural intelligence so that I can organize successful working relationships at the workplace.

I have researched and noted the following countries where I can endeavor to go culturally intelligent.Harmonizing to Triandis, H ( 2006 ) an person can go culturally intelligent by seeking to get the better of ethnocentrism. An ineluctable fact of life is that all human existences are ethnocentric. This means that all human perceive things as normal because of their cultural upbringing.

However the successful directors are those who overcome this ethnocentrism and learn to appreciate other civilizations. They understand that things which are normal in one civilization are different in another civilization. The fact to notice is that if one individual knows merely one civilization it is inevitable that that individual will go ethnocentric.

Thus a manner to develop to get the better of this issue of ethnocentrism is to analyze about different civilizations. To get the better of this issue I will endeavor to believe from the other individual ‘s position and seek to be in the other individual ‘s places.The 2nd of import dimension associating to cultural intelligence is empathy. Harmonizing to Ascalon, E ( 2008 ) empathy is a individual understands of the behavior of others.

This is a capableness which is every bit of import as get the better ofing ethnocentrism. Peoples who excel in transverse cultural societal intelligence or cultural intelligence are empathic and non-ethnocentric. These are the two pillars of going culturally intelligent.As a university pupil I will take at socialising more at university and understanding other people ‘s civilization. I believe that merely by interaction can I learn about other civilizations and go non-ethnocentric. DiStefano and Maznevski ( 2000 ) attributed ethnocentrism as a barrier to successful intercultural communicating. Therefore I aim at interrupting down the barriers by get the better ofing this issue of ethnocentrism. The accomplishments of cultural intelligence are of import in this age of globalisation and in a multicultural society I believe that I have to be empathic.

Mentions:Triandis, HarryA CA ( 01/02/2006 ) .A ” Cultural Intelligence in Organizations ” .A Group & A ; organisation managementA ( 1059-6011 ) , 31A ( 1 ) , A p.A 20.Ascalon, MaA EvelinaA ( 2008 ) .

A ” Cross-cultural societal intelligence ” .A Cross cultural managementA ( 1352-7606 ) , A 15A ( 2 ) , A p.109DiStefano, J.J. and Maznevski, M.L. ( 2000 ) , “ Making values with diverse squads in planetary direction ” , Organizational Dynamics, Vol.

29 No. 1, pp. 45-63.Question 4: Ethical Decision MakingThe puting off of workers is the most hard undertaking a director has to manage. In this state of affairs where I have to use a determination doing model to make up one’s mind which workers to put off. The ethical determination devising model is described which I applied to come to a determination.

Harmonizing to Jones, T ( 2003 ) the ethical determination doing model should follow the organisation civilization. As a director I will do the determination as to the state of affairs and organisation ‘s cultural point of view, The organisation civilization will put out what is right, proper and just. As an person I would do the determination of confer withing all the staff members and inquiring them which one of them wants early retirement.However as a director I owe duty to the other stakeholders of the organisation.

Loe, Ferrell, & A ; Mansfield, ( 2000 ) repeat the fact that the organisational civilization affects the ethical determinations that are made and I believe that this is the appropriate ethical determination devising model which should be followed in this state of affairs. This model is utile because it is situational and realistic. In the existent universe there are other considerations which have to be managed. Some organisations are designed in a manner which promotes an individualistic point of view.Lovell, A ( 2002 ) went a measure in front and described moralss as a dependent variable of single and organisational factors. Therefore when doing this tough determination I will weigh up the state of affairs in footings of my single powers every bit good as my organisational committednesss.

Once I have assessed the state of affairs I will so do the determination which I believe is right. As an person I will be inclined to make the right thing and confer with all employees to advance transparence. However I will hold to equilibrate my single mentality with organisational force per unit areas. Such a determination devising model is valid in the existent universe.