Results: and more than two thirds of control groups

Results:

Table
(1):
It is clear from table (1) that more than  half of study group subjects, and more than
two thirds of control groups subjects were males, and about half of study group
subjects and more than  half of control
groups subjects aged  between 50-  60 years with mean age of (47.76±7.85) , (49.93±11.50) respectively. Moreover, about one third of both groups had
secondary degrees however (32.5%)
(21.7%) of both groups respectively were Single. .No significant statistical
differences were seen between the two groups in relation to the above mentioned
demographic variables.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Table (2): shows that the majority of both
groups had Renal pelvis stone with mean stones size of (14.71 ± 6.54) and
(13.82 ± 4.21) for both study and control group respectively.  Moreover,  
majority of both groups had single stone.

 
          Table (3): of note, it is obviously that, no statistically significant
difference was found between both groups pre-teaching, however, a highly
significant difference was found between the two groups after the designed
instructions were given in relation to knowledge levels.100% of both groups had
poor knowledge pre teaching in contrast to post teaching at first session, (78.4%)
and (0%) of both groups had good knowledge. Also a highly significant difference
was found between two groups regarding to total knowledge scores.

Table
(4): of note, concerning the severity of anxiety and levels, a
highly significant difference was found post
teaching at 1st session and at 2nd session. (59.5%) and (56.7%) of both study and control
group respectively, had Severe level of anxiety pre teaching, In contrast,, post teaching at 2nd., session , (0%) and (37.8%) of both groups had Severe
anxiety.

Table (5) it
is obvious that, no statistically significant difference was found between both
groups before the pre-instructional
module was given in relation to total horizontal
visual analogue scale scores of claustrophobia.
However,
after the pre-instructional module was given, a highly significant difference was found between the two
groups at the 1ist session and at 2nd session.

Table (6) showed
that,
significant lowering of pain score for study group than control group when
comparing pain score post procedure at first session and at 2nd session.

Table (7)  
In relation to Session Successful treatment, it is obvious that (67.6 %) of study
group subjects completed the procedure successfully, however, (56.76.%) of
control groups subjects only can complete the procedure successfully.  There was a significant
difference regarding to Session Successful treatment between two groups.

Table
(8) This table shows that (13.51.3%) of
study group and (16.22%) of the control group need for   hospitalization after shock wave lithotripsy
session..

Table (9) indicates that a strong positive
Correlation between severity of anxiety and Claustrophobia, as well between
severity of anxiety and pain Scores.