Question: how the Ottomans and the Safavids. The Ottomans

Question: Compare the three Muslim empires: the Ottomans, the Safavids, and the MughalsContextualization: The three Muslim empires were the Ottoman, the Safavid, and the Mughal. The Ottomans controlled Hungary, Albania, Yugoslavia, Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania. The Safavids ruled in Persia and Afghanistan and the Mughals ruled much of India. The three empires possessed a great military and also a great political power. The empires also produced an artistic and also a cultural renaissance within Islam. All three dynasties originated from Turkic nomadic cultures, each possessing religious zealousness (trying too hard). They built their empires through military conquest, based on their use of effective firearms. The three empires were all ruled by an absolute monarch. The Mughals ruled most of the non-Muslim people, the Safavids ruled mostly Muslims, and the Ottomans ruled a mixture of Muslims and also Christians. The Safavids were Shi’a Muslims, and the other Muslims/empires were Sunni.Argumentation: Babur was the first Mughal emperor that was located in India. Babur and his followers were from Turkic-speaking groups in Asia just like the Ottoman and Safavid empires. The Mughal empire was the last of the three empires to be established. Babur made many of his choices for the empire based on how the Ottomans and the Safavids. The Ottomans built an empire in the eastern Mediterranean. The Ottomans patterned much of their empire on the ideas of earlier Muslim civilizations. This included warfare, architecture, and engineering in the Islamic civilization pertaining to new levels of attainment.Body Paragraph 1: The OttomansClaim 1: MilitaryConcrete evidence: MIlitary leaders played a dominant role within the military. Geared the economy towards warfare and also expansionQuote: “Military leaders played a dominant role in the Ottoman empire, and the economy of the empire was geared to warfare and expansion” (Stearns 461)Claim 2: The SultansConcrete evidence: Grew more distant from “people” as their empire grew in sizeQuote: “Like the Abbasid caliphs, the Ottomans sultans grew more and more distant from their subjects as their empire increased in size and wealth” (Stearns 462)Claim 3: Decline of the Ottoman EmpireConcrete evidence: The literature that concentrates was the adversary of Christendom to the “sick man”Quote: “Much of the literature on the Ottoman Empire concentrates on its slow decline from the champion of the Muslim world and the great adversary of Christendom to the “sick man” (Stearns 463)Body Paragraph 2: The SafavidsClaim 1: WarConcrete evidence: The most powerful warrior leader occupied important posts in the imperial administrationQuote: “The most powerful in the warrior leaders occupied key posts in the imperial administration, and from the defeat at Chaldiran onward they posed a constant threat to the Safavid monarchs” (Stearns 468-469)Claim 2: ReligionConcrete evidence: Imported Arabic-speaking Shi’a religious expertsQuote: “The early Safavids imported Arabic-speaking Shi’a religious experts” (Stearns 470)Claim 3: Decline of the Safavid EmpireConcrete evidence: The power and splendor that the Safavid empire was given by the end of the reign of Abbas 1 (1588–1629), started the collapseQuote: “Given the power and splendor the Safavid Empire had achieved by the end of the reign of Abbas 1, its collapse was stunningly rapid” (Stearns 472)Body Paragraph 3: The MughalsClaim 1: AkbarConcrete evidence: Became one of the greatest leadersQuote: “Their expectations were soon dashed because Akbar proved to be one of the greatest leaders of all history” (Stearns 473-474)Claim 2: Social reform and social changeConcrete evidence: With Akbar involving the position of women, showed how far he was advancing in timeQuote: “More than any of Akbar’s many reform efforts, those involving the position of women demonstrated how far the Mughal ruler was in advance of his time” (Stearns 475)Claim 3: Decline of the Mughal empireConcrete evidence: Muslim kingdoms, continued to resist Mughal hegemony and Islamic invaders took down the MughalsQuote: “In addition, Muslim kingdoms in central and east India continued to resist Mughal hegemony, and Islamic invaders waited at the poorly guarded passes through the Himalayas to strike and plunder once it was clear that the Mughals could no longer fend them off” (Stearns 479)